Combination of fire needle and filiform needle for frozen shoulder in different clinical stages  

作　　者：Yan GAO Mei-ying LIU Shuang WANG Yue-hui CHEN Jie-ping XIE Mei-qi JI 高艳;刘美颖;王爽;陈跃辉;解秸萍;冀美琦(中共中央党校(国家行政学院),北京100091;北京市西城区展览路社区卫生服务中心,北京100037;北京中医药大学针灸学院,北京100029)

机构地区：[1]Party School of the Central Committee of CP.C (National Academy of Governance), Beijing 100091,China [2]Community Health Service Center, Exhibition Road of Xicheng District,Beijing 100037, China [3]School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China

出　　处：《World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion》2019年第2期119-122,共4页世界针灸杂志（英文版）

摘　　要：Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of fire needle combined with filiform needle for different clinical stage frozen shoulders,and to choose the best treatment opportunity for clinical treatment of frozen shoulder.Methods:120 patients with frozen shoulders who met the inclusion criteria were numbered according to the visiting order.They were randomized into control group(60 cases)and treatment group(60 cases)according to the random number table.Both groups were treated with filiform needles once every other day and 3 times a week,and a course of treatment included 6 times and 2 courses were taken.The treatment group was treated by applying a fire needling point bloodletting on the local tender points once a week.Jiānyú(肩髃 LI 15),Jiānliáo(肩髎 TE 14),Jiānzhēn(肩贞 SI 9),Tiáokǒu(条口 ST 38),and local tender points were taken according to different meridian pains.The clinical efficacy of the frozen shoulder patients in the two groups in different clinical stages was compared.The evaluation indicators were scores of pain,joint activity range and activities of daily living,as well as clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine.Results:After treatment,the total scores of hundred-mark five-grade in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(Treatment group82.02 ± 14.23 vs 43.37 ± 22.10,Control group 66.80 ± 18.98 vs 42.67 ± 23.03,both P<0.01),and the total score of the treatment group was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.01).The hundred-mark five-grade assessment scores after treatment in the treatment group during the frozen stage were significantly higher than the control group(77.2± 14.40 vs 68.43 ± 16.94,P<0.01);as to the clinical efficacy,the total effective rate of the treatment group was higher than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(91.67% vs 76.67%,P<0.01);The total effective rate of the control group in the acute stage and functional recovery stage was coObjective:To observe the clinical efficacy of fire needle combined with filiform needle for different clinical stage frozen shoulders,and to choose the best treatment opportunity for clinical treatment of frozen shoulder.Methods:120 patients with frozen shoulders who met the inclusion criteria were numbered according to the visiting order.They were randomized into control group(60 cases)and treatment group(60 cases)according to the random number table.Both groups were treated with filiform needles once every other day and 3 times a week,and a course of treatment included 6 times and 2 courses were taken.The treatment group was treated by applying a fire needling point bloodletting on the local tender points once a week.Jiānyú(肩髃 LI 15),Jiānliáo(肩髎 TE 14),Jiānzhēn(肩贞 SI 9),Tiáokǒu(条口 ST 38),and local tender points were taken according to different meridian pains.The clinical efficacy of the frozen shoulder patients in the two groups in different clinical stages was compared.The evaluation indicators were scores of pain,joint activity range and activities of daily living,as well as clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine.Results:After treatment,the total scores of hundred-mark five-grade in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(Treatment group82.02 ± 14.23 vs 43.37 ± 22.10,Control group 66.80 ± 18.98 vs 42.67 ± 23.03,both P<0.01),and the total score of the treatment group was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.01).The hundred-mark five-grade assessment scores after treatment in the treatment group during the frozen stage were significantly higher than the control group(77.2± 14.40 vs 68.43 ± 16.94,P<0.01);as to the clinical efficacy,the total effective rate of the treatment group was higher than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(91.67% vs 76.67%,P<0.01);The total effective rate of the control group in the acute stage and functional recovery stage was co

关 键 词：PERIARTHRITIS of the SHOULDER Clinical STAGE FIRE NEEDLE FILIFORM NEEDLE 

分 类 号：R[医药卫生]