霍耐特承认理论的发展与超越——基于阿多诺非同一性思维的基本特征  

The Development and Transcendence of Honet’s Recognition Theory:Based on Basic Characteristics of Adorno’ s Non-identity Thinking

作　　者：王慧楠 汤俪瑾 WANG Huinan;TANG Lijin(School of Marxism,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei,Anhui 230026,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期60-65,共6页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(WK2111070006)

摘　　要：霍耐特基于阿多诺的非同一性思维提出“为承认而斗争”的理论,其内涵包括“爱、法律、团结”三种承认形式和“强暴、剥夺权利、侮辱”三种蔑视形式。霍耐特承认理论与阿多诺非同一性思维有着密不可分的联系,承认理论对非同一性思维,首先完成了社会批判到政治伦理批判、从异质性到同质性、从绝对否定到相对否定的发展,然后又从解决路径和物化概念上实现了从艺术之路到承认之路、从客体优先到主体优先的超越路径。探寻二者之间的关系,可使承认理论在新时代条件下发挥更大的现实意义和实践价值。Honet put forward the theory of "struggle for recognition" based on Adorno s non-identity thinking, which includes three forms of recognition, i.e.,"love, law and solidarity", and three forms of contempt, i.e.,"rape, deprivation of rights and insult". Honet s recognition theory has intimate contact to Adorno s non-identity thinking.First, it completed a development from social criticism to the political and ethical criticism, from heterogeneity to homogeneity and from the absolute negation to the relative negation. And then, from the solution path and the concept of materialization, it realized a transcendence from the road of art to recognition and from object to subject preference. It is necessary to explore the relationship between the two so that the recognition theory can have more practical significance and values in the new era.

关 键 词：承认理论 非同一性 蔑视 超越 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]