西方理论与中国问题——理论对话的新视角（座谈实录）  

Western Theory and China’s Problem: A New Perspective of Theoretical Dialogue(Colloquium Records of Liu Kang, Zhu Liyuan, Zeng Jun, etc.)

作　　者：刘康[1] 朱立元[3] 曾军[2] 毛雅睿 张俊丽(整理) 朱国华[4] 颜芳 李松[6] 杨建刚[7] 李辉[8] 吴娱玉 Mao Yarui;Zhang Junli

机构地区：[1]杜克大学 [2]上海大学 [3]复旦大学 [4]华东师范大学 [5]华南师范大学 [6]武汉大学 [7]山东大学 [8]山东师范大学 [9]不详

出　　处：《上海文化》2019年第8期56-66,132,157,共13页Shanghai Culture

摘　　要：中西文论和文化传统的关系不应是"刺激—反应"的模式,即西方理论的强势输入,中国文论的被动接受,而应从"文明互鉴"的角度来看,中国文论"西化"的过程同时也正是"化西"的过程,它不应被看作"失语"。根据中国的具体国情和文化进展有选择性地吸收西方文论,由此形成的误读、错位恰恰是中国化的一个部分。将中国理论生产视为世界理论生产的某种内部性的甚至是源头性、显要性的存在,因此中国当代文论必须超越民族主义、地域主义、中心主义的狭隘思维。The relationship between Sino-Western literary theory and cultural tradition should not be a “stimulus-response” model,i.e.domineering input of western theory and passive acceptance of Chinese literary theory.Instead,it should be a process of both “Westernization” of Chinese literary theory which leads to “aphasia” and “transformation” of western literary theory from the perspective of “mutual learning of civilizations”.The misunderstanding and misplacement which results from selectively learning from western literary theory according to China’s specific national conditions and cultural progress is precisely a part of the transformation from western culture into Chinese one.While taking Chinese theoretical production as an internal,even original and dominant part of the world’s theoretical production,Chinese contemporary literary theory must transcend nationalism,regionalism and centralism.

关 键 词：文学理论 西方 中国 对话 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]