检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雅 Hu Ya(School of Law, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院
出 处:《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》2019年第9期103-107,共5页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
摘 要:信用证由于其自身的独立性特点使得信用证欺诈现象不断出现,为了在一定程度上防范此类现象的发生,信用证欺诈例外原则应运而生。我国信用证欺诈例外原则的适用主要是依据2006年颁布的《最高人民法院关于审理信用证纠纷案件若干问题的规定》,通过对实践中的具体案例进行分析,发现我国信用证欺诈例外原则的适用存在的问题主要是银行拒付的条件以及信用证欺诈判定的实质性标准,据此提出完善建议。As a payment method, a letter of credit has been widely used in international trade. At the same time, the phenomenon of letter of credit fraud has been emerging. In order to prevent such phenomena from happening to a certain extent, the exception principle of fraud for letters of credit has been established. The application of the principle in China is mainly based on the "Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Letters of Credit Disputes" promulgated in 2006. This paper analyzes the specific cases and the application of the exception principle of fraud in China. The problems are mainly the conditions for bank refusal and the substantive criteria for the determination of letters of credit fraud. Based on the analysis we are put forward some suggestions to perfect the principle of exception in judcial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15