检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:匡浩 孙婕[2] KUANG Hao;SUN Jie(Qingdao Maritime Court,Qingdao 266061,China;People’s Procuratorate of Huangdao District,Qingdao 266555,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛海事法院,山东青岛266061 [2]青岛市黄岛区人民检察院,山东青岛266555
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2019年第3期32-40,共9页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:在对部分海事案件裁判文书进行实证分析的基础上可以看出,海事案件电子数据证据真实性认证中存在错误使用佐证规则、过于依赖公证的作用、未充分说明理由等问题。分析问题原因后,提出正确的路径为深入了解海事案件电子数据证据尤其是海事特有电子证据,掌握关于电子数据证据的特别规定,正确指引当事人举证、质证,结合证据特点和特别规定进行真实性认证。最后列举部分海事特有电子证据用以上路径进行真实性认证,在对具体证据认证时应当结合证据特点,适用不同的标准。On the basis of the analysis of some judgments of maritime cases,it is found there are mistakes in authenticating electronic data evidence in maritime cases,such as wrongly usage of rule of being supported by other evidences,depending unduly on notarization,and explaining the reason inadequately.Based on the analysis of the causes of these problems,the authors believe the proper approach is to have some insight into maritime electronic data evidence,know the specific provisions of electronic data evidence well,inform the parties concerned of the requirements for producing evidences and cross-examinations,and verify the genuineness in accordance with the characteristics and specific provisions of the electronic data evidence.Instances are cited to illustrate the above-mentioned solution which is to apply different standards according to the characteristics of evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97