机构地区:[1]湖南中医药大学,湖南长沙410208 [2]湖南中医药大学第一附属医院脾胃病科,湖南长沙410007
出 处:《中国中西医结合消化杂志》2019年第9期653-661,共9页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine on Digestion
基 金:湖南省科技创新项目(No:2018SK51201);湖南省教育厅重点项目(No:17A158);湖南中医药大学中医学国内一流建设学科(2018年—2020年)
摘 要:[目的]运用循证医学方法系统性评价中药联合三联疗法治疗Hp阳性消化性溃疡的有效性和安全性。[方法]检索Web of science、EM-BASE、PubMed、Cochrane library、VIP、CNKI、WanFang Data、CBM数据库,收集相关的随机对照设计试验(RCT),筛选文献、提取资料,评价文献质量,并采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。[结果]共纳入41篇文献,共4 493例。Meta分析结果显示:与对照组三联疗法比较,中药联合三联疗法的Hp根除率[OR=2.62,95%CI(2.14,3.22)],6个月内Hp复发率[OR=0.32,95%CI(0.16,0.63)],1年内Hp复发率[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.12,0.57)],临床总有效率[OR=5.35,95%CI(4.00,7.16)],胃镜溃疡疗效总有效率[OR=3.62,95%CI(2.56,5.11)],6个月内溃疡复发率[OR=0.18,95%CI(0.07,0.48)],1年内溃疡复发率[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.15,0.43)],及不良反应发生率[OR=0.31,95%CI(0.22,0.45)]的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。[结论]与三联疗法比较,中药联合三联疗法有效、安全,能提高Hp根除率与消化性溃疡的临床疗效,降低Hp复发率和溃疡复发率,远期疗效更佳,并减少不良反应的发生。敏感性分析结果提示发表性偏倚影响不大,结果比较稳定,结论有效。[Objective]To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine combined with triple therapy in the treatment of Hp-positive peptic ulcer with evidence-based medicine.[Methods]Search Web of science,EM-BASE,PubMed,Cochrane library,VIP,CNKI,WanFang Data,CBM database,collect relevant randomized controlled design experiments,screen literature,extract data,evaluate literature quality,and use RevMan5.3 software.Conduct a meta-analysis.[Results]A total of 41 articles were included,a total of 4493 cases.Compared with the control group,the Hp eradication rate of traditional Chinese medicine combined with triple therapy[OR=2.62,95%CI(2.14,3.22)],Hp recurrence rate within 6 months[OR=0.32,95%CI(0.16,0.63)],Hp recurrence rate within 1 year[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.12,0.57)],total clinical effective rate[OR=5.35,95%CI(4.00,7.16)],curative effect of gastroscopic ulcer The total effective rate[OR=3.62,95%CI(2.56,5.11)],ulcer recurrence rate within 6 months[OR=0.18,95%CI(0.07,0.48)],ulcer recurrence rate within 1 year[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.15,0.43)],curative effect of gastroscopic ulcer,the total effective rate[OR=3.62,95%CI(2.56,5.11)],ulcer recurrence rate within 6 months[OR=0.18,95%CI(0.07,0.48)],ulcer recurrence rate within 1 year[OR=0.26,95%CI(0.15,0.43)] and the incidence of adverse reactions[OR=0.31,95%CI(0.22,0.45)] were statistically significant(P<0.01),as the Meta-analysis showed.[Conclusion]Compared with triple therapy,traditional Chinese medicine combined with triple therapy can improve the clinical efficacy of Hp eradication rate and peptic ulcer,reduce Hp recurrence rate and ulcer recurrence rate,improve long-term efficacy and reduce adverse reactions.It’s safe and effective.Sensitivity analysis showed that the publication bias had little effect,the results were stable and the conclusions were valid.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...