检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨超[1] 危怀安[1] YANG Chao;WEI Huai-an(College of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学公共管理学院
出 处:《科学学研究》2019年第9期1651-1659,共9页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(17CGL001);国家留学基金委2017年国家建设高水平公派研究生项目(201706160073)
摘 要:本文以国家重点实验室科研工作者为研究样本,分析了政策助推、创新搜索机制对科研绩效的影响。建立了以问题界定和跨界搜索两种创新搜索机制为中介构念的政策助推影响科研绩效单中介和双中介模型,并采用Bootstrap法和PRODCLIN法检验了三个假设模型。研究发现:政策助推对科研绩效具有正向影响作用;创新搜索机制在政策助推影响科研绩效的过程中发挥完全中介作用,问题界定机制和跨界搜索机制的中介路径均具有统计显著性,但是问题界定机制的中介效果明显小于跨界搜索机制。研究丰富了创新搜索机制的前置要素分析,并增强对政策影响个体行为的关注。Using researchers working in the State Key Laboratories of China as a sample, this paper analyzes the impact of policy nudge, innovation search mechanism on the research performance. By constructing two single-mediator models and a double-mediator model with problem framing and boundary spanning mechanisms as the mediating constructs, we tested the proposed models through Bootstrap and PRODCLIN methods. Results show that policy nudge is positively related to the research performance;innovation search mechanism play a full mediating role in the impacting process of policy nudge on research performance;the paths of problem framing and boundary spanning are statistically significant in the mediating tests, but the impact of the former is less than that of the latter. This study enhances the previous studies by paying attention on the antecedent factors of innovation search and the impacts of policy on the individual behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249