非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪的规范解释  

The Normative Interpretation of the Crime of Illegal Possession of Terrorist or Extremist Objects

作　　者：石聚航[1] 谢文婷 SHI Ju-hang;XIE Wen-ting(Nanchang University Legislative Research Center,Nanchang 330031;Jiangxi Provincial People’s Procuratorate,Nanchang 330029,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学立法研究中心,南昌330031 [2]江西省人民检察院,南昌330029

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2019年第5期117-128,共12页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地——南昌大学立法研究中心招标项目“恐怖主义犯罪立法研究”(JD17097)

摘　　要：非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪中的持有应当采取合目的扩大解释的立场,没有合法正当根据是其核心要义。当《刑法》明确区分储存和持有时,持有的范围应当限缩解释。在《刑法》没有区分时,应当将本罪中的持有理解为包括储存。非法持有宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品罪和持有假币罪等犯罪中的持有在司法认定上应当适度区分,前者不要求具有特定的目的,而后者通常具有使假币进入流通领域等目的,后者应当采取限缩解释。非法持有后宣扬,应当根据宣扬的对象和持有的对象关系作出区别处理,同一宗的对象,以及仅将非法持有的部分物品宣扬的,按照宣扬行为论处。非法持有和宣扬的物品属于不同宗时,存在数罪并罚的空间。在认定本罪明知时不宜过度强调行为人的智力等因素,应当并进一步细化司法解释中的以客观事实为基础的法则,并肯定违法性认识错误的重要性,以做出合理的解释。We should take the position of expanding the interpretation of the purpose about the illegal possession of terrorism and extremist objects. Illegitimacy is the key point of such criminal behaviors. When the criminal law clearly distinguishes between storage and possession, the scope of possession should be limited. When the criminal law doesn’ t distinguish them, storage shall be regarded as a way of possession. The concept of possession should be appropriately distinguished between the illegal possession of terrorism and the crime of possession of counterfeit money in judicial recognition. The former has no specific purpose, while the latter usually has the purpose of making counterfeit money into circulation. The latter should adopt a restrictive interpretation. After illegal possession, publicity should be treated differently according to the object of publicity and the relationship between the objects held, and the object of the same case, and if only some items illegally held are publicized, they shall be punished as propaganda. The items illegally held and promoted belong to different cases, and there is room for several crimes and penalties. The judgment practice should not over-emphasize the actor’s intelligence and other factors when it is aware of the crime, and should adhere to and further refine the rules based on objective facts in judicial interpretation. When determining the intent, we should affirm the error of understanding the illegality in order to make reasonable explanations.

关 键 词：非法持有 宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义物品 规范解释 

分 类 号：DF622[政治法律—刑法学]