未成年人认罪认罚具结的反思与重构——兼评《刑事诉讼法》第174条第2款之规定  

Reflection and Reconstruction of Recognizance in the Leniency System of Juvenile Guilty Plea:Comment on the Article 174 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：刘浩[1] LIU Hao

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2019年第5期121-128,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College

摘　　要：认罪认罚具结是认罪认罚从宽制度中的核心内容,其本质是对已查证的犯罪行为予以认可并对此表示负责与悔过。根据《刑事诉讼法》第174条第2款的规定,无论法定代理人是否同意,均可以对未成年人适用认罪认罚从宽制度,这导致了理论上的矛盾和实践中的操作困难。在现有法律框架下,未成年人认罪认罚具结制度与法定代理制度产生冲突,其冲突本质即是国家亲权与自然亲权的博弈。解决问题的关键在于以未成年人利益最大化为核心,对未成年人适用认罪认罚从宽程序进行重构。重构的方向在于以检察机关依职权提起的方式,通过第三方机构中立客观的评估,对涉罪未成年人实现个别化处遇。Recognizance is the core of leniency system of guilty plea,which is to admit the proven criminal act and show responsibility and remorse for it. According to article 174(2) of the criminal procedure law,the leniency system of guilty plea can be applied to juveniles whether the legal agent agrees or not,which leads to theoretical contradictions and op. erational difficulties in practice. Under the existing legal framework,the leniency system of juvenile guilty plea conflicts with the legal agency system,and this means the conflict between Parens Patriae and parental rights. The key to solve the problem is to reconstruct the leniency system of guilty plea for juveniles with the interests of juveniles as the core. The direc. tion of reconstruction is to achieve individualized treatment of juveniles involved in crimes through a neutral and objective assessment initiated by the procuratorate at its own initiative and implemented by a third-party institution.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 具结书 法定代理 国家亲权 个别化处遇 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]