检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢杰锋 LU Jie-feng(School of law,University of International Business and Ecorwmices,Beijing 100029 .China)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院
出 处:《妇女研究论丛》2019年第5期80-88,共9页Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
基 金:对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(批准编号:18YB05)
摘 要:在过去的十多年中,中国在禁止职场性骚扰立法方面有了长足的进步。但从司法实践来看,法律对职场性骚扰的干预尚不充分,涉及职场性骚扰的法律规制体系尚存在一些较为明显的短板。"证明难"是职场性骚扰受害者在维护自身合法权益过程中面临的主要障碍之一。在厘清举证责任分配原则的基础上,应当围绕证据形式、证明力等方面进行相应的突破和完善,以有效解决职场性骚扰案件"证明难"问题。Over the past decade,China has made considerable progress in legislation against sexual harassment in the workplace.However,judicatory practice shows that the legal intervention in workplace sexual harassment is insufficient,and there are some obvious shortcomings.The difficulties of proving is one of the main obstacles faced by victims of sexual harassment in the workplace in the process of safeguarding their legitimate rights and interests.This paper analyses the proof of sexual harassment in the workplace,and considers that on the basis of clarifying the burden of proof,breakthroughs and improvements should be made in the form of evidence and the weight of proof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15