检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹飞[1] 赵永亮[1] 李明[1] 刘于[1] 储开岳[1] Cao Fei;Zhao Yongliang;Li Ming;Liu Yu;Chu Kaiyue(Department of Radiotherapy,Nantong Tumor Hospital,Jiangsu Nantong 226361,China)
机构地区:[1]南通市肿瘤医院(南通大学附属肿瘤医院)放疗科
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2019年第21期3862-3865,共4页Journal of Modern Oncology
基 金:江苏省重点研发计划(编号:BE2017679)
摘 要:目的:对比研究宫颈癌调强放疗中行仰卧位与俯卧位的两种固定方式时的摆位误差及剂量学差异。方法:随机选取64例宫颈癌患者分成两组,每组32例,分别选取仰卧位和俯卧位方式固定。两组患者均行首次摆位、摆位误差纠正及治疗期间的CBCT扫描,将CBCT扫描图像与治疗计划CT图像自动匹配配准,分别得到X轴(左右方向)、Y轴(头脚方向)、Z轴(腹背方向)的摆位误差数据;同时通过TPS计算两组病例靶区的D95、Dmean、CI、HI以及危及器官小肠、膀胱、直肠、结肠、股骨头、盆骨、脊髓、乙状结肠分别在等剂量线包含的体积百分比下的剂量值大小。结果:仰卧位患者与俯卧位患者在X、Y、Z轴方向平均误差分别为[(2.55±1.21)mm,(2.13±1.12)mm]、[(4.01±1.16)mm,(2.44±1.57)mm]、[(3.46±1.43)mm,(2.89±1.21)mm]。俯卧位固定组X、Y、Z轴方向平均误差均小于仰卧位固定组,且均具有统计学差异(P<0.05);在靶区的D95、Dmean、CI、HI均不具有统计学差异(P>0.05),除股骨头、盆骨、脊髓、乙状结肠外,俯卧位固定组的危及器官小肠、膀胱、直肠、结肠在等剂量线包含的体积百分比下的剂量值明显小于仰卧位固定组,且均具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在宫颈癌调强放疗中,与仰卧位固定相比,俯卧位固定可明显减少其摆位误差,以及在靶区受量归一一致的情况下,更好地保护了危及器官。Objective:To compare the placement error and dosimetric difference between the two methods of supine and prone position in cervical cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Methods:We randomly selected 64 patients with cervical cancer and divided them into two groups,32 in each group,and were placed in the supine and prone position.The two groups of patients were subjected to CBCT scan after the first placement,correction of the placement error and during the treatment.Then,the images of the CBCT scan were automatically matched with the CT images of the treatment plan,and finally the X-,Y-and Z-were obtained respectively.At the same time,TPS was used to calculate the dose value of D 95,D mean,CI,HI of the target and organs at risk(small intestine,bladder,rectum,colon,femoral head,pelvis,spinal cord,sigmoid colon)in the target area of the two groups of patients at the volume percentage contained in the isodose line.Results:The average errors in the X,Y,and Z directions of the supine and prone patients were[(2.55±1.21)mm,(2.13±1.12)mm],[(4.01±1.16)mm,(2.44±1.57)mm],[(3.46±1.43)mm,(2.89±1.21)mm],respectively.The average errors in the X,Y and Z directions of the prone position were smaller than those in the supine position,and both were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no statistical differences in D95,Dmean,CI,and HI in the target area(P>0.05).Except for the femoral head,pelvis,spinal cord,and sigmoid colon,the doses of the small intestine,bladder,rectum,and colon in the prone position were significantly lower than those in the supine position,and both were statistically significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:In intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer,prone position fixation can significantly reduce the placement error compared with supine position,and better protection of organs at risk when the target area is consistent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31