检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084 [2]上海交通大学工商管理系,上海200052
出 处:《管理工程学报》2002年第4期9-12,共4页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目 ( 70 0 710 16 )
摘 要:在一个双寡头市场中 ,一个企业从事成本降低型R&D。R&D结局是随机的 ,但R&D成功时非创新企业获得的溢出是确定的。创新企业可以在进行R&D之前或之后收购竞争者 ,分别称为事前收购和事后收购。本文对事前收购和事后收购两种策略进行了对比分析。结果表明 ,当R&D溢出较大时创新企业将选择事前收购 ,而溢出较小时将选择事后收购。值得注意的是 ,创新企业选择的收购方式同时也使消费者剩余和R&D投资达到最大。最后指出 。In a duopoly market,one firm conducts cost-reducing R&D. R&D outcome is stochastic,yet the non-innovating firm gets certain spillovers from successful R&D.The innovating firm may take over its either before or after the R&D activities are conducted.The corresponding takeover polices are called ex-ante takover and ex-post takeover,respectively.This paper makes a comparison between ex-ante takeover and ex-post takeover.It is shown that,the innovating firm chooses ex-ante takeover for large spillover and ex-post takeover for small spillover.It is remarkable that the takeover policy chosen by the innovating firm also maximizes R&D investment and consumer surplus. Finally,it is pointed out that no takeover is never the innovating firm's optimal policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112