检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张祯宇 ZHANG Zhen-yu(Law School,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui 230601)
机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2019年第7期66-72,95,96,共9页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“以审判为中心视角下重构侦诉审关系研究”(17BFX061)
摘 要:审查逮捕阶段排除非法证据相较于刑事诉讼的其他阶段对于保护犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益而言具有最佳效果,而在司法实践中存在侦查机关难被监督、辩护律师有心无力、检察机关监督乏力的问题。作为应对,应从推进侦查讯问全程录音录像制度、建立辩护律师在审查逮捕阶段有限制地介入调查取证机制、增强检察机关外部监督三个方面完善审查逮捕阶段非法证据排除程序,以求建立一套符合我国当前国情的相对完善的排除非法证据的制度。Compared to other stages of criminal proceedings,excluding illegal evidence in the review arrest phase is most effective in protecting the criminal suspects’legitimate rights and interests.In judicial practice,there are cases in which investigative organs are poorly supervised,defense lawyers are powerless,and procuratorial organs are weak.Accordingly,it is necessary to improve the process of excluding the illegal evidence in the arrest stage in three ways,i.e.,establishing a full audio and video recording system for investigation and interrogation,establishing a mechanism in which the defense lawyer can limitedly participate in the investigation and evidence collection,and strengthening the external supervision of the procuratorial organ,so that we can establish a relatively perfect systemof excluding illegally obtained evidence in line with China’s current conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49