徽州礼学发展与晚明考证学风  

Development of Huizhou Ritual Studies and Textual Research Style in Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：徐道彬[1] XU Daobin(Huixue Research Center,Anhui University,Hefei,Anhui 230039)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学徽学研究中心

出　　处：《绍兴文理学院学报》2019年第4期61-69,共9页Journal of Shaoxing University

基　　金：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“清代徽人文集叙录”(12JJD750016)

摘　　要：明代学术被称为“荒经时代”的说法,有失公允。除了理学和心学的“经义别解”外,杨慎、胡应麟、方以智等一批学者的学术贡献,已足以推倒“明代无学问”的谬说;晚明徽州学者金瑶、程明哲、姚应仁等,也执着于经书文本的考证,与时代风气相抗衡。他们以通经复古的著述和严谨笃实的学风,证明了有明一代实学发展的内容与特色,在一定意义上也反映出地域礼仪文化的实态与风貌。It is unfair to name the Ming dynasty’s academic studies as“the age of wasted classics”.Except for the fact that the Classics of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties and Wang Yangming’s mind theory can be otherwise explained,the academic contributions made by Yang Shen,Hu Yinglin,Fang Yizhi and other scholars are enough to overthrow the fallacy that there is no learning in the Ming dynasty.In the late Ming dynasty,such Huizhou scholars as Jin Yao,Cheng Mingzhe and Yao Yingren were all persistent in textual research of classics,courageously confronting the trend of the times.They proved the content and characteristics of the development of the Ming dynasty’s realism with their classical,rigorous and sincere style of study.In a sense,all this also reflects the reality and style of the regional etiquette culture.

关 键 词：晚明学风 礼学 理学 徽学 

分 类 号：G127.54[文化科学]