检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李若璇 刘红瑞 姚梅林 Li Ruoxuan;Liu Hongrui;Yao Meilin(Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology,Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学心理学部应用实验心理北京市重点实验室
出 处:《心理科学》2019年第4期827-833,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目“基于学校—家庭一体化的纵向心理健康教育和心理疏导的应用示范研究”(2012BAI36B03)的资助
摘 要:为探讨不同来源自主支持对青少年幸福感和孤独感的影响,采用问卷调查的方法,测量了2941名青少年感知到的父母和班主任自主支持、生活满意度、积极情感、消极情感和孤独感。结果发现:(1)存在四个自主支持潜在剖面:父母低-班主任较高自主支持组(5.88%)、父母中等-班主任低自主支持组(5.00%)、较高自主支持组(56.21%)以及高自主支持组(32.91%);(2)男生、年龄大的青少年更可能归为父母中等-班主任低自主支持组;(3)高自主支持组幸福感最高、孤独感最低,较高自主支持组次之,父母低-班主任较高自主支持组幸福感最低、孤独感最高;(4)对青少年的幸福感和孤独感而言,父母自主支持更为重要。Most of previous studies on autonomy support were based on variable-centered approach(e.g., investigating the effects of specific autonomy support on some outcomes). The present study adopted person-centered approach to explore the associations among parents’ autonomy support, head teacher’s autonomy support, subjective well-being and loneliness. This study aimed to identify the natural configurations of parental and head teacher’s autonomy support among Chinese adolescents, to investigate the associations among demographic variables and autonomy support profiles, and to examine the differences among those autonomy support profiles on adolescents’ subjective well-being(SWB;indicated by life satisfaction, positive affect and negative affect) and loneliness.The Psychological Parental Autonomy Support Questionnaire, Head Teachers’ Autonomy Support Questionnaire, Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale(MSLSS), Affect Balance Scale(ABS), Adolescents Loneliness Questionnaire, and demographic information questionnaires were administered to 2941 adolescents(Mage = 14.58, SD = 1.56). Our sample included 1301(44.20%) males, 1638(55.70%) females(2 participants missed the gender information). We used Mplus 7.11 to conduct latent profile analysis to identify the best number of the potential autonomy support profiles. Then, we conducted multivariate logistic regression to examine the influence of gender, age, Socioeconomic status(SES) on the autonomy support profiles above. Finally, ANOVAs and post hoc tests(Bonferroni) were conducted after controlling demographic variables(gender, age and SES) to reveal the differences among profiles on SWB and loneliness. Results identified four meaningful profiles named as "low parents and moderately high head teacher autonomy support"(5.88%), "medium parents and low head teacher autonomy support"(5.00%), "moderately high autonomy support"(56.21%) and "high autonomy support"(32.91%). Moreover, males and younger adolescents had more likelihood of membership into medium
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169