项部速刺与留针治疗周围性面瘫的效果比较  

Effect comparison of nape quick needling and retaining needling in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis

作　　者：潘伟娟 屈玉明 张天生[3] 郝重耀[4] PAN Weijuan;QU Yuming;ZHANG Tiansheng;HAO Chongyao(Graduate Faculty,Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shanxi Province,Taiyuan030024,China;Administration Office,Shanxi Health Vocational College,Shanxi Province,Taiyuan030012,China;Department of Moxibustion,the Third Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shanxi Province,Taiyuan030000,China;Administration Office,the Third Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Shanxi Province,Taiyuan030000,China)

机构地区：[1]山西中医药大学研究生部,山西太原030024 [2]山西卫生健康职业学院行政处,山西太原030012 [3]山西中医学院第三中医院灸疗科,山西太原030000 [4]山西中医学院第三中医院行政处,山西太原030000

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2019年第24期154-156,共3页China Medical Herald

基　　金：山西省中医药管理局科研课题项目(2016ZYYZ13)

摘　　要：目的比较项部速刺与留针治疗周围性面瘫的效果。方法选取2017年12月~2018年9月于山西中医学院第三中医院就诊的30例周围性面瘫患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为对照组(留针)和治疗组(速刺),每组15例,分别予以项部丛刺留针和速刺治疗,均以5 d为一个疗程,共治疗4个疗程,每个疗程结束后休息2 d,比较两组疗效及治疗前后面部残疾指数(FDI)量表各项评分。结果治疗后,两组FDI量表各项评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),但两组治疗后FDI量表各项评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论项部丛刺速刺与留针在周围性面瘫的治疗中有相同的效果。Objective To compare the effect of nape quick needling and retaining needling in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis.Methods Thirty patients with peripheral facial paralysis treated in the Third Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Shanxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine from December 2017 to September 2018 were selected as study subjects.They were divided into control group(retained needling)and treatment group(quick needling)according to random number table method,with 15 cases in each group.Control group and treatment group were treated with nape cluster retained needling and quick needling respectively.They were treated with 5 days as a course of treatment,with a total of 4 courses of treatment.After each course of treatment,they took a rest of 2 days.The efficacy and scores of the front disability index(FDI)scale before and after treatment of two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the scores of FDI scale in both groups were higher than those before treatment(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the scores of FDI scale between two groups after treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,there was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Nape cluster quick needling and retained needling have the same effect in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis.

关 键 词：周围性面瘫 项部丛刺 速刺 留针 

分 类 号：R745.12[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]