侦控机关刑事案卷移送中的“证据偏在”  

On "Eevidence Biasing" in Investigation Organs’ Delivery of Criminal Case Files

作　　者：史炜 王逍奕 SHI Wei;WANG Xiao-yi(School of Humanity and Law,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou 014010,China;School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古科技大学文法学院,内蒙古包头014010 [2]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《广西警察学院学报》2019年第4期43-47,共5页Journal of Guangxi Police College

基　　金：2017年度内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目(NJSY17184)

摘　　要：侦控机关移送案卷时存在着筛选有罪或罪重证据,忽视、隐匿无罪或罪轻证据的“证据偏在”行为。对抗因素导致检察机关角色定位存在偏差;科层制下考评机制导向的行为驱动;证据收集与审查的主体存在思维误区等是“证据偏在”产生的原因。可通过采取信息技术手段规制、建立侦控机关合理的内部考核机制和加强律师的外部监督等多种措施防范“证据偏在”,通过保证刑事案卷的完整移送来避免冤案发生。"evidence biasing"in investigation organs'delivery of files,which means focus is rather placed on evidences of guilt or serious guilt,than on evidences of innocence or misdemeanour.The opposability factors breed deviation in procuratorial organs'role positioning.The mis-understanding in thinking in evidence collection and reviewing subjects gives birth to"evidence biasing".Accordingly,efforts need to be made to be on guard agaiinst"evidence biasing"in diversified ways:regulation by means of information technology,establishment of a reasonable internal assessment mechanism for investigation organs and intensification of external lawyers supervision.Only in this way,can complete and sound delivery of criminal case files be guaranteed and the cases of injustice be prevented.

关 键 词：侦查机关 检察机关 刑事案卷移送 证据偏在 案卷完整性 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]