检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋争辉 王勇 SONG Zhenghui;WANG Yong(Department of education,southwest university,chongqing 400715,China;Xinyang normal university,xinyang 464000,China)
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育学部,重庆400715 [2]信阳师范学院,信阳464000
出 处:《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》2019年第5期45-53,共9页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:大学基层学术组织是在学科制度化与学科去制度化的相互博弈过程中不断形成和发展的。学科制度既是构成现代大学组织制度的基础,又是促进大学基层学术组织形成和发展的动力。在知识既高度分化又高度综合的背景下,学科发展面临着去制度化的压力;学科过度制度化制约传统基层学术组织的变革,给其组织模式和治理机制带来严重挑战。为应对学科制度危机,应从学科理念、学科结构、学科治理、学科文化等方面入手,创新我国大学尤其是研究型大学的基层学术组织的治理理念、治理结构和运行机制,回归大学基层学术组织作为人才培养和知识生产的学科属性,着力增强组织治理能力,提升学术创新能力。The basic-level academic organizations in universities are formed and developed in the constant interaction between institutionalization and deinstitutionalization.Disciplinary institution is the foundation of modern university organizational system,and it is also the driving force to promote the formation and development of the basic-level academic organizations in universities.Under the background of the great differentiation and integration of different knowledge areas,the current disciplinary institution has increasingly presented some problems,restricting the change of the traditional disciplinary organization and bringing about some serious challenges to the organization mode and operation mechanism of our universities.In order to cope with the crisis of the disciplinary institution,we should reconstruct and innovate the idea,structure and mechanism for the governance of the basic-level academic organizations from such aspects as the disciplinary concept,structure,system and culture,so as to enhance the capacity of academic governance and innovation.
分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49