2010—2017年京津冀中小企业科技创新政策评价  被引量:23

Evaluation on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Science and Technology Innovation Policy in 2010—2017

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杜丹丽[1] 原琳 高琨 Du Danli;Yuan Lin;Gao Kun(School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University,Harbin 150001,China)

机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院

出  处:《中国科技论坛》2019年第10期100-109,共10页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基  金:教育部人文社科规划项目“价值共创对企业创新绩效的影响机理研究:创新生态系统的视角”(19YJA630015);黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(17GLH22);哈尔滨工程大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(HEUCFP201826)

摘  要:本文借助政策计量分析工具和PMC指数模型建立中小企业科技创新政策的综合评价体系,从时间维度看政策制定呈梯度递增趋势,从支持维度看政策还存在局限性,结合PMC得分和PMC曲面对国家和京津冀的四项科技创新政策进行量化评价。分析结果表明国家和京津冀发布的规划类政策较多,缺乏落地实施;人才激励政策不足,配套措施较少。京津冀发布的政策整体缺乏反馈和监督环节。在此基础上提出京津冀地区中小企业科技创新政策的优化建议,从而为京津冀协同发展提供有效的政策支持。This paper uses the policy measurement analysis tool and the PMC index model to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for SMEs science and technology innovation policies.From the time dimension,the policy formulation shows a gradient increasing trend.From the support dimension,the policy still has limitations,combined with PMC scores and PMC surface pairs.The country and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei s four science and technology innovation policies are quantitatively evaluated.The analysis results show that the country and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei have issued more planning policies,lacking implementation;lack of talent incentive policies and fewer supporting measures.The overall policy issued by Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei lacks feedback and supervision.On this basis,the paper puts forward the optimization suggestions for the science and technology innovation policies of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,and provides effective policy support for the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei.

关 键 词:中小企业 科技创新 政策评价 PMC指数模型 

分 类 号:F270.3[经济管理—企业管理]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象