检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江海洋 Jiang Haiyang
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《财经法学》2019年第6期86-99,共14页Law and Economy
摘 要:互联网时代急剧变革,共享经济模式迅速崛起,使用权的地位在经济生活中日益重要。盗窃罪非法占有目的之有无不能推导出使用盗窃是否具有可罚性。共享经济模式下的使用权有必要以刑事手段保护,从盗窃罪的刑法史可以得出盗窃罪之对象是基于经济发展而在不断变动的,刑法的谦抑性不能成为刑事手段缺位的理由,民事手段并不足以调整共享经济模式带来的变革。使用盗窃可以解释为利益盗窃,利益盗窃并未突破盗窃罪的客观构成要件,共享经济模式下的占有应理解为规范性的占有。在共享经济模式下,利益盗窃的数额是可以量化计算的。With the rapid change of the internet era and the rapid rise of the sharing economy model,the use of the status of the economic life is increasingly important.whether the purpose of illegal possession of larceny can deduce the penability of using larceny,it is necessary to protect the right of use under the sharing economy model by criminal means.It can be concluded from the criminal law history of larceny that the object of larceny is constantly changing based on economic development.The modesty of criminal law cannot be the reason for the absence of criminal means,and civil means are not enough to adjust the reform brought by the sharing economy model.The use theft can be interpreted as interest theft,which does not break through the objective elements of theft,and the possession under the sharing economy model should be understood as normative possession.Under the sharing economy model,the amount of benefit theft can be quantified.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.41