检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:官子力 张旭梅[1,2] 但斌[1,2] GUAN Zi-li;ZHANG Xu-mei;DAN Bin(School of Economics and Business Administration,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China;Chongqing Key Laboratory of Logistics at Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室,重庆400044
出 处:《中国管理科学》2019年第10期56-65,共10页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2018YFB1701502);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572020);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB16003)
摘 要:针对需求不确定环境下制造商既提供产品也提供相关服务时产品服务供应链中的信息共享与激励问题,考虑零售商拥有需求预测信息且可选择共享任意水平的信息量,通过构建不完全信息下的动态博弈模型,分析了零售商信息共享水平、制造商服务效率以及消费者服务敏感性对服务价值和信息共享价值的影响,并提出了基于两部补偿契约的信息共享激励策略。研究表明:需求信息共享能够有效提升整个供应链的服务价值;当制造商服务效率或者消费者服务敏感性较高时,信息共享的服务改善效应将占优于其双边际效应,零售商会自愿共享全部需求信息并达到供应链“双赢”;而当制造商服务效率或者消费者服务敏感性较低时,采用两部补偿激励契约可实现产品服务供应链中的完全信息共享,并且契约实施难度会随着零售商需求预测精度、制造商服务效率以及消费者服务敏感性的提高而降低。With the market competition getting fiercer,it’s difficult to maintain a competitive advantage by just lowering product price.Thus,more and more manufacturers begin to provide related service with the product to improve product value and enhance brand competitiveness.In this context,high level of the service can improve customer satisfaction and increase product sales.However,there always exists uncertain market risk in the manufacturer’s operation.Demand uncertainty affects not only the product pricing but also the service decisions,and thus may reduce the overall profits of the supply chain.Therefore,it’s necessary to address the problems of information sharing and incentive strategy in the product service supply chain(PSSC)when the manufacturer supplies both the product and the related service under the uncertain demand environment.This paper includes the following four parts.Firstly,a multistage game model of incomplete information is built to analyze the impacts of the retailer’s information sharing level,the manufacturer’s service efficiency and the consumer’s service sensibility on the equilibrium decisions and the value of service.Secondly,the values of information sharing to the PSSC and supply chain members are explored,and two effects of information sharing are revealed,namely the positive service improvement effect and the negative double marginalization effect.Thirdly,the feasible condition of information sharing is analyzed and a two-part compensation contract is proposed to encourage the retailer to share demand information.Finally,the main conclusions are illustrated through numerical examples.The result indicates that the demand information sharing by the retailer helps the manufacturer to adjust service level in respond to market fluctuation,and thus effectively enhances the service value of the whole supply chain.However,information sharing is not always beneficial to the PSSC.When the manufacturer’s service efficiency or the consumer’s service sensitivity is very low,the positi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.239.109