检察机关侦查权限度保留的内在逻辑及其合理配置  

Inherent logic and rational allocation of limited reservation of the procuratorate’s investigation power

作　　者：王译 WANG Yi(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心

出　　处：《湖南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第5期62-68,共7页Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(17BFX053);国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心资助项目(教技函2013[26])

摘　　要：2018年10月通过的《刑事诉讼法》修正案对检察机关的侦查权予以限度保留。赋予检察机关部分侦查权是检察权范畴下的应有之义,符合以公诉职能为主导的检察权定位,便于检察机关对司法渎职犯罪进行调查,有利于实现诉讼监督效能最大化。因司法人员渎职犯罪的监察调查与检察侦查在立案管辖上存在重构,须对检察机关的有限侦查权进行合理配置。应进行内设机构改革,以刑事检察业务部门为主体行使部分侦查权,确认其在特殊情形下的优先侦查顺位,以检察官"客观义务"理论为支撑呈现刑事证据调查的客观性与全面性。The amendment to the "Criminal Procedure Law" enacted in October 2018 limited the investigation power of the Procuratorate. Granting procuratorate partial investigation power, an essential component of procuratorial power, conforms to the positioning of procuratorial power oriented by public prosecution function, facilitates the procuratorate to investigate crimes of judicial malfeasance and conduces to maximizing the efficiency of litigation supervision. Due to the reconstruction in the functional jurisdictions between the supervision and procuratorial investigation in malfeasance crimes committed by judicial personnel, the limited investigative power of the procuratorate should be rationally allocated. Hence, internal organizations should be reformed, partial investigation power should be exercised by the criminal prosecution departments as pillars, and priority should be confirmed in special circumstances so as to present the objectivity and comprehensiveness of criminal evidence investigation supported by Prosecutors ’Objective Obligation Theory.

关 键 词：补充侦查 侦查便宜 立案管辖 诉讼监督 法律帮助 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]