“醉驾”不起诉裁量权的适用及完善  

The Application and Perfection of the Non-Prosecution Discretion on Drunk Driving

作　　者：蔡巍[1] Cai Wei

机构地区：[1]最高人民检察院检察理论研究所

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第5期50-60,191,共12页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：运用不起诉裁量权分流"醉驾"犯罪案件既能发挥刑事司法程序的调解功能,解决我国刑法参与社会治理过程中出现的惩罚过度问题,也能增强检察机关转处和在法庭之外处理案件的能力,提升刑事司法系统打击犯罪的整体水平,解决司法资源有限性和"醉驾"案件高位徘徊、司法机关办案负担有增无减之间的矛盾。针对相对不起诉在分流"醉驾"犯罪中存在的问题,可以借鉴荷兰的刑事处罚令和我国台湾地区的附条件不起诉制度,建立"醉驾"附条件不起诉制度,完善"醉驾"不起诉制度体系。The use of non-prosecution discretion to divert "drunken driving"criminal cases can not only play the mediation function of the criminal justice process,but also solve the problem of excessive punishment in the process of participation of our country’s criminal law in social governance. It can also extend the capacity of the criminal justice system by increasing the prosecutorial power to divert cases and to settle cases out of court in order to solve contradiction between limited judicial resources and a large number of drunk driving cases which is putting too much burden on the judicial system. In view of the problems caused by applying unconditional non-prosecution in diverting"drunken driving"cases,we can learn from the system of penal order in Holland and the system of conditional non-prosecution in our Taiwan District,to establish a "drunk driving"conditional non-prosecution system and to improve the "drunk driving"non-prosecution system.

关 键 词：“醉驾” 相对不起诉 附条件不起诉 非刑罚处罚方法 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]