中美LIS硕士专业与课程设置的比较研究——基于ALA认可的LIS院校和中国“985”与“211”LIS院校的分析  

A Comparative Study of Sino-US LIS Master’s Specialties and Curricula——Analysis Based on LIS Colleges and Universities of ALA Authorized and Chinese "985 " and "211"

作　　者：盛小平 苏红霞 SHENG Xiao-ping;SU Hong-xia(School of Library,Information and Archives,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444;Guangdong Urban&Rural Planning And Design Institute,Guangzhou 510200)

机构地区：[1]上海大学图书情报与档案系,上海200444 [2]广东省城乡规划设计研究院,广州510200

出　　处：《科技情报研究》2019年第1期75-83,共9页Scientific Information Research

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2017年度学科共建项目“大数据环境下的信息资源管理学科建设与人才培养机制研究”(编号:GD17XTS05)

摘　　要：通过采用网络调查法和比较分析法,调查美国图书馆协会认可的50所院校和我国36所“985”与“211”院校的LIS硕士专业及其研究方向与课程设置,然后从两国专业设置、研究方向以及课程设置三方面探讨其异同。借鉴美国LIS硕士专业与课程设置经验,提出改进我国LIS硕士专业与课程设置的一些建议。By use of methods of network investigation and comparative analysis,this paper investigates the basic situation of LIS master's specialties and its research directions and curriculum settings by 50 colleges and universities authorized by ALA and 36 Chinese"985"and"211"colleges and universities,and discusses their similarities and differences among two countries'specialty settings,research directions and curriculum settings.Some suggestions on how to improve the LIS master's specialty and curriculum settings in our country are put forward by reference of American LIS master's specialty and curriculum settings.

关 键 词：LIS 硕士专业 课程设置 比较分析 美国 中国 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]