检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹洁[1,2] 施琴芬[3] 李锋[2] Yin Jie;Shi Qinfen;Li Feng(Business School,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098;School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212003;Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215009)
机构地区:[1]河海大学商学院,南京210098 [2]江苏科技大学经济管理学院,镇江212003 [3]苏州科技大学,苏州215009
出 处:《管理评论》2019年第10期255-262,共8页Management Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303074)。
摘 要:有效的情景推理能够帮助应急决策者在极端洪水关键情景的高压力下制定合理的对策,而现有案例推理方法无法解决数据类型多样、历史样本量小等难题。本文基于知识元理论划分并界定极端洪水关键情景,结合知识元间关系、专家知识,构建情景检索信度规则库体系及情景相似度评估的信度规则库,通过证据推理方法融合信度规则,完成极端洪水关键情景检索及推理,为极端洪水关键情景的应对提供最合理的决策支持。以淮河流域蒙洼蓄洪区启用情景为例,验证了极端洪水关键情景推理方法的适用性与可行性。Effective scenario reasoning can help emergency decision makers work out reasonable solution under high pressure of the extreme flood key scenario,but the existing method of CBR could not address the difficulty caused by multiple data types and insufficient historic samples. Extreme flood scenario is defined and represented generally based on knowledge element by scenario division,and belief rule-base for scenario reasoning is constructed based on relation of knowledge elements and expert knowledge. Based on belief rule-based inference methodology by evidential reasoning approach,extreme flood key scenario retrieval and reasoning is completed,which could improve the effectiveness of decision-making by historical emergency solution for extreme flood key scenario emergency management. Taking the scenario of Mengwa flood storage areas starting in Huaihe Valley as an example,the applicability and feasibility of this method is proved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117