检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李漫[1] LI Man(Department of Clinical Laboratory,The Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201900)
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院检验科,上海201900
出 处:《大医生》2019年第10期44-45,共2页Doctor
摘 要:目的比较双纸片增效法与双纸片协同法在非发酵菌β-内酰胺酶检测中的应用,比较两种检测方法的阳性率等指标。方法以头孢他定为底物,乙二胺四乙酸二钠(EDTA.2Na)为酶抑制剂,运用双纸片增效法和双纸片协同法共同检测131株非发酵菌是否产生β-内酰胺酶。结果131株中有38株双纸片增效法阳性,有120株双纸片协同法阳性。结论双纸片协同法较双纸片增效法结果直观,影响因素少,且阳性率高。Objective To compare the application of double-disc efficacy method and double-disc synergy method in the detection of beta-lactamase in non-fermenting bacteria,and to compare the positive rates of the two methods.Methods Using ceftazidime as substrate and EDTA.2Na as enzyme inhibitor,131 strains of non-fermenting bacteria were tested forβ-Lactamase production by double-disc efficacy method and double-disc synergy method.Results Among 131 strains,38 were positive by double-disc efficacy method and 82 were positive by double-disc synergy method.Conclusion The results of double-disc synergy method are more intuitive than that of double-disc efficacy method,with fewer influencing factors and higher positive rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222