吴经熊法学思想中的西方与东方  

The West & East in John C.H.Wu’s Jurisprudence

作　　者：聂鑫[1] Nie Xin

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第6期105-111,共7页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

基　　金：陕西高校青年创新团队项目:“先秦法家思想与秦文化的当代价值”

摘　　要：吴经熊作为近代中国“现象级”的法律精英,从上世纪90年代以来受到学界的普遍关注。吴经熊本人受过西方系统的法学教育,对中国文化亦有比较深入的研究,自我期许为“超越东西方”。学界普遍认为,吴经熊早期为人为学有“全盘西化”的倾向;他中年之后醉心于中国传统文化而非法学研究,也被解读为是在中国法律现代化过程中遭遇严重挫折后的转向。可是我们检视吴经熊早期的法学作品,发现其法学思想中仍包含很多东方的元素,甚至有“中体西用”之嫌;在对待西方各法学流派的态度上,吴经熊选择性地接收了以霍姆斯为代表的法律实用主义与庞德的社会学法学,这些思想都与中国传统法哲学思维有会通之处。他中年之后致力于东西方宗教与哲学的研究,或许正是为了从基础做起、真正“超越东西方”,最终实现中国法的“文艺复兴”。John C.H.Wu,a reputed legal scholar in modern China,has been drawing academic attention since the 1990s.Wu received a systemic western legal education,and was also well informed with traditional Chinese culture,and that is why he named his autobiography Beyond East and West.Some scholars regard Wu at his young age as the representative of total westernization in legal thought.Later,his research interests shifted from jurisprudence to the Chinese philosophy,which might have been caused by the failure in the struggle for the modernization of Chinese legal system.However,there re many Chinese features in Wu s early legal publications.He prefered Justice Holmes legal pragmatism and Roscoe Pound s sociological jurisprudence,both of which share some similarities with the traditional Chinese legal philosophy.After his middle age,Wu focused his research interests on the comparative study of the religion and philosophy between the East and West,reflecting his attitude of laying a solid academic base for the legal Renaissance of China.

关 键 词：吴经熊 超越东西方 法律实用主义 西化 传统 民族性 

分 类 号：D909[政治法律—法学理论]