两岸刑事再审程序之比较研究  

Comparative Study of Criminal Retrial Procedures between the Two Sides of the Taiwan Strait

作　　者：唐晟 Tang Sheng(School of Law,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning 530006,China)

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院

出　　处：《梧州学院学报》2019年第4期44-50,共7页Journal of Wuzhou University

基　　金：广西民族大学2018年研究生教育创新计划重点项目(gxun-chxzs2018130)

摘　　要：近年来通过对一系列冤假错案的纠正,司法公信力也不断得到提升。再审程序在发现和纠正错误判决方面发挥着重要作用,我国台湾地区于2015年修改了“刑事诉讼法”,降低了再审程序的申请门槛,旨在彰显救济无辜的立法精神。通过对台湾地区再审制度的梳理,并从再审制度的功能、再审启动事由和再审审理程序三个维度与大陆的再审制度进行比较,对于大陆再审制度指导思想的变革、立法表述明确化以及引入“有利于被告”的原则具有重要的意义。作为一种特别的刑事救济制度,再审程序在平冤的路途上仍需要法律职业共同体的坚忍持恒。In recent years,through the correction of a series of false and wrong cases,the judicial credibility has also been continuously improved.The retrial procedure plays an important role in the discovery and correction of wrong judgments.In Taiwan,the“Criminal Procedure Law”was amended in 2015,which lowered the threshold for applications for retrial procedures,aiming at demonstrating the innocent legislative spirit.It is of great significance for the mainland’s reform of the guiding ideology of the retrial system,clarification of the legislative expression and introduction of“the reformation”to comb the retrial system in Taiwan and compare the three dimensions of the retrial system,the retrial reason and the retrial procedure of Taiwan with the retrial system of the mainland.As a special criminal relief system,the retrial procedure still needs the perseverance of the legal professional community on the road of correcting wrong cases.

关 键 词：再审程序 非常上诉程序 比较研究 错案纠正 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]