检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁文峰 LIANG Wen-feng(Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学法政学院
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2019年第11期61-65,共5页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:庭前证据开示制度旨在保证控辩双方于开庭前了解对方所掌握证据,由此做好于庭审中进行对抗和防御的充分准备。庭前证据开示的“证据”和“开示”各自都有着丰富而独特的内涵,并对刑事诉讼证明活动发挥着规范和指引作用。修订后的刑事诉讼法在扩大辩护律师阅卷范围的基础上,确立了我国的刑事证据开示制度,然而其中亦留有问题。作为看得见的正义,刑事诉讼程序价值的实现需要包括庭前证据开示在内的整体制度进行持续性的改革与完善。The pre-trial evidential disclosure system is designed to ensure that both the accused and the defending parties understand the evidence held by the other party before the trial,so as to make full preparations for confrontation and defense in the trial.The“evidence”and“discovery”of pre-trial evidence have their own rich and unique connotation and play a normative and guiding role in the criminal procedure proof activities.The revised criminal procedure law has established the system of criminal evidence discovery in China on the basis of expanding the scope of defense lawyers’examination papers.However,there are still some problems.As visible justice,the realization of the value of criminal procedure needs continuous reform and improvement of the whole including pre-trial evidential disclosure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15