禁止不利益变更原则的本土化构想——以日本为借鉴  

Localization of the Principle of Prohibiting the Change of Adverse Interests: Taking Japan as a Reference

作　　者：黄力韬 HUANG Li-tao(Ningbo University,Ningbo Zhejiang 315211)

机构地区：[1]宁波大学

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2019年第6期47-53,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：禁止不利益变更原则对于约束法官裁判行为和保障上诉人权益具有重要价值。我国立法尚未规定禁止不利益变更原则,且学者对该原则的基本概念存在混淆,但根据对裁判文书的分析,我国司法实践中已经确立了这一审判理念。由于中日两国上诉"请求拘束"的理论基础以及判决理由的效力存在较大区别,相关理论和制度的改造是构建禁止不利益变更原则的前提。具体来说,增加关于上诉请求约束裁判范围的立法,"不利益"的范围扩大至判决理由中的事实判断,增设附带上诉制度并修改发回重审的规定。The principle of prohibiting the change of adverse interests is of great value to restrain the judge’s adjudication behavior and protect the appellant’s rights and interests.The principle of prohibiting the change of adverse interests has not yet been stipulated in the legislation in China,and scholars are confused about the basic concept of this principle.However,according to the analysis of judicial documents,this trial concept has been established in the judicial practice in China.Since there are great differences in the theoretical basis of appeal“request restraint”between China and Japan and the effect of judgment reasons,the transformation of relevant theories and systems is the premise of constructing the principle of prohibiting the change of adverse interests.Specifically,by adding the legislation on the binding scope of the appeal request,the scope of“non-interest”is extended to the factual judgment in the reasons of the judgment,the incidental appeal system is added,and the provisions of the retrial are amended.

关 键 词：民事上诉审 禁止不利益变更 审理范围 裁判范围 判决效力 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]