检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭婷婷[1] 李宝库[1] Guo Tingting;Li Baoku(School of Marketing Management,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao 125105,China)
机构地区:[1]辽宁工程技术大学营销管理学院
出 处:《经济与管理》2019年第6期50-57,共8页Economy and Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71172218);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金博导类资助课题(20122121110005)
摘 要:基于实验的方法,探讨不同类型网络购物服务失误情境下顾客心理契约破裂的差异以及服务补救的修复效应,结果表明:核心服务失误情境下,顾客心理契约破裂的严重程度高于传递系统服务失误和交互系统服务失误;在不同类型的服务失误情境下,顾客关系型心理契约破裂的严重程度高于交易型心理契约破裂;服务补救策略对两种心理契约破裂的修复效应存在差异;失误归因对服务补救策略同心理契约破裂间的关系具有一定的调节作用。Based on the experimental method, this paper discusses the difference of customer psychological contract breach under different types of online shopping service failure and the repair effect of service recovery.The results show that: under the condition of core service failure, the severity of customer psychological contract breach is higher than that of delivery system service failure and interaction system service failure. Moreover,under different types of service failure,the severity of customer relational psychological contract breach is higher than that of transactional psychological contract breach.The effect of service recovery strategy on the two kinds of psychological contract breach is different. Fault attribution has a moderating effect on the relationship between service recovery strategy and psychological contract breach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145