消费格式合同管辖协议效力研究——兼论《民诉法解释》第31条的规定  

Study on the Validity of the Jurisdiction Agreement of Consumption Format Contract——Combination of the Provisions of Article 31 of the Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law

作　　者：肖建国[1] 刘文勇[1] XIAO Jian-guo;LIU Wen-yong

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2019年第6期59-69,共11页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金品牌计划;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助“民事纠纷的多元化解决机制研究”(10XNI033)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：消费格式合同管辖协议既是特殊的管辖协议,又是特殊的格式合同。合同的效力主要受到合同订立程序与合同条款内容的影响。针对消费格式合同管辖协议,其效力考察也可以从管辖协议的订立程序和管辖协议的内容两方面展开。在管辖协议订立程序方面,《民诉法解释》第31条规定经营者未以合理方式提请消费者注意管辖协议的,消费者可以主张管辖协议无效;在管辖协议内容方面,消费者可以管辖协议内容显失公平为由主张管辖协议无效。The jurisdiction agreement of consumption format contract combines a special jurisdiction agreement and a special format contract. The validity of the contract is mainly affected by the contract procedure and the contents of the contract terms. The validity of the consumption format contract can also be studied from both the procedure of the jurisdiction agreement and the contents of the jurisdiction agreement.In terms of the procedure of jurisdiction agreement,Article 31 of the Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that if the operator fails to draw the attention of the consumer to the jurisdiction agreement in a reasonable manner,the consumer may claim that the jurisdiction agreement is invalid;while in terms of the contents of the jurisdiction agreement,the consumers may claim that the jurisdiction agreement is invalid on the ground that the contents of the agreement is obviously unfair.

关 键 词：消费者 格式合同 管辖协议 

分 类 号：DF71[政治法律—诉讼法学]