农村特殊教育的双重属性及其跨期矫正:基于不同支出类型的视角  

The Dual Nature of Rural Special Education and its Intertemporal Correction: Evidence from Different Expenditures

作　　者：罗吉 谢舜[2] LUO Ji;XIE Shun(Business School,Guangxi University;School of Public Policy&Management,Guangxi University)

机构地区：[1]广西大学商学院 [2]广西大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《教育经济评论》2019年第5期52-68,共17页China Economics of Education Review

摘　　要：农村特殊教育既具有一般教育的公共性,又具有特殊教育的"长尾"性。这种双重属性使其容易造成供给不足,但受到来自不同供给者(政府和其他社会参与者)不同类型支出的影响,具有跨期识别与矫正机制。本文使用2003-2014年我国30个省份的面板数据,对这种跨期矫正机制进行了检验,并发现不同供给者不同类型的支出对这种机制具有差异化影响。总体来说,政府支出比其他社会组织支出更为显著,其中资本性支出对于矫正机制具有正面影响,行政性支出对于矫正机制具有负面影响,而教师福利支出与学生补助支出对于农村特殊教育的跨期矫正却并不显著。这可能是由于不同利益相关者差异化的激励动机导致分配扭曲,以及差异化的治理与行政效率导致福利效应损失。基于这些差异,不同供给者在农村特殊教育供给中应该更加注重对其需求的精准识别来实现这种跨期矫正机制。The dual nature of rural special education(RSE)means it has the public nature of externalities and the "long tail" nature of discreteness and privateness,easy to cause provision insufficiency.But it may have intertemporal correction mechanism impacted by different expenditures of supply sectors.This paper uses different models and data from 30 provinces in China during 2003-2014 to analyze this correction mechanism.It finds that different kinds of expenditure from different suppliers have divergent effects on this correction.The capital expense have significantly positive effects,but the administrative expense have significantly negative effects.These may be caused by the various governance efficiency and motivation of all stakeholders in RSE.We should pay more attention on the accurate recognition and effective satisfaction of RSE affected by the governance efficiency and motivation of different suppliers to achieve this correction.

关 键 词：农村特殊教育 双重属性 跨期矫正 支出类型 

分 类 号：G76[文化科学—特殊教育学]