检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童美华 陈墀成[1] TONG Meihua;CHEN Chicheng(Department of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian,361005)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学哲学系
出 处:《自然辩证法通讯》2019年第12期97-102,共6页Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基 金:2019年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“不确定性条件下科学知识生产模式的社会学研究:以环境健康风险评价为例”(项目编号:19YJAZH129)
摘 要:技术整体论为芬伯格的生态技术观确立了理论视域。芬伯格的生态技术观认为,现代技术与人和自然对立的根源在于技术被限定在"初级工具化"的层次上,只有重新恢复"次级工具化"的地位,使技术再情境化,才能重构技术、自然、人的和谐关系。在新技术的中介下,人与自然将走向更高水平的综合。这亟待技术设计的民主化和向社会主义过渡。芬伯格的生态技术观在深化人们对技术、自然、人关系的认识,纠正人们对技术生态负效应的片面认识,指导我国构建与生态文明相适应的技术体系,引发人们对协调技术、自然、人关系路径的多维思考等方面,具有重要的意义。The technology holism establishes the theoretical horizon for Feenberg’ view of ecological technology according to which that modem technology conflicts with man and nature is rooted in that technology is limited on the level of "primary tools". Only if we refocus on the "subprine tools", we can reconstruct harmonious relationship among technology,man and nature. In the case of new technology as a medium, man and nature will move towards a higher level of integration. But this urgently needs the democratization of technological design and the transition to socialism. Feenberg’s view of ecological technology deepens people’s understanding on the relationship among technology, nature and man and corrects the one-sided understanding of technology’s negative ecological effect;and guides our country to construct a technological system suitable for ecological civilization;and initiates people’s multi-dimensional thinking on the path of how to coordinate the relationship among technology, natureand man.
分 类 号:N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229