检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李朝霞[1] 董培[1] 白亚秋[1] 赵性泉[1] LI Zhao-Xia;DONG Pei;BAI Ya-Qiu;ZHAO Xing-Quan(Department of Neurology,Beijing Tian Tan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100070,China)
出 处:《中国卒中杂志》2019年第10期1011-1014,共4页Chinese Journal of Stroke
基 金:首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院“苗圃”计划(2017MP06),首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院青年基金(2017-YQN-18)
摘 要:目的对比平卧位与坐位时,经颅多普勒增强试验(contrast enhanced transcranial Doppler,cTCD)对于偏头痛患者右向左分流(right-to-left shunt,RLS)的筛查及定量分析的影响。方法纳入2014年7月-2017年2月门诊就诊的偏头痛患者。收集患者基线信息及临床特征。所有入组患者均于平卧位及坐位时行cTCD检查。每个体位均行两步操作,包括平静呼吸及配合Valsalva呼吸。比较坐位和平卧位cTCD及不同呼吸状态下RLS栓子出现的时间和数量。结果研究纳入254例患者,其中143例存在RLS(56.3%)。与平卧位相比,坐位平静呼吸(38.6%vs 31.1%)和Valsalva呼吸(56.3%vs 45.3%)情况下RLS的诊断阳性率都有所提升。与平卧位相比,坐位明显缩短了平静呼吸、Valsalva呼吸第一个栓子出现的时间(7.56±2.12 s vs 9.89±2.31 s,P=0.003;5.94±1.28 s vs 7.34±2.23 s,P<0.001)及增加了栓子出现的数量[2(0~6)vs 5(4~9)个;9(4~14)vs 10(6~33)个,均P<0.001)。同时,与平静呼吸相比,Valsalva呼吸缩短了平卧位、坐位第一个栓子出现的时间(均P<0.001)及增加了栓子出现的数量(均P<0.001)。结论与传统平卧位比较,坐位更有助于cTCD检查中RLS的筛查及定量。Objective To analyze the influence of supine position and sitting position in detecting right-to-left shunt(RLS)using contrast enhanced transcranial Doppler(cTCD),to optimize cTCD procedure.Methods Patients with migraine from July,2014 to February,2017 were selected.The baseline data and clinical features data were collected.All participants underwent cTCD examination,which was done in state of rest and Valsalva maneuver in every position.The results of cTCD,the occurring time and number of RLS microbubble in different state in two positions were compared.Results Finally,254 patients(57.1%were female)were included in this study,with 143(56.3%)ones with RLS.The diagnosis positive rate of RLS in state of rest(38.6%vs 31.1%)and valsalva maneuver(56.3%vs 45.3%)both increased in sitting position,compared with that in supine position.Compared with supine position,sitting position shortened the occurring time of first microbubble(7.56±2.12 vs 9.89±2.31 s,P=0.003;5.94±1.28 vs 7.34±2.23 s,P<0.001)and increased the total number of microbubbles[2(0-6)vs 5(4-9);9(4-14)vs 10(6-33);both P<0.001]in state of rest and valsalva maneuver.Compared with the state of rest,Valsalva breathing shortened the occurring time of first microbubble(both P<0.001)and increased the total number of microbubbles(both P<0.001)in supine and sitting position.Conclusions Sitting position is superior to supine position in detecting and quantitative analysis of RLS using cTCD.
分 类 号:R74[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3