对于弗雷格“第三域”的思考——兼与陈波、王路教授商榷  

Thoughts on Frege’s Third Field:Discussions with Professors Chen Bo and Wang Lu

作　　者：杨红玉[1] 储明亮 YANG Hongyu;CHU Mingliang

机构地区：[1]河南大学哲学与公共管理学院

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第4期107-118,共12页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“量词与量化理论的哲学面向及其效应研究”[项目编号:18BZX134]

摘　　要：国内学者陈波教授和王路教授就弗雷格的思想理论展开了讨论,谈论的中心聚焦在“思想”是否是属于第三域以及陈波教授对弗雷格思想理论的修正。首先,陈波教授对于弗雷格思想的解读在有些地方是值得商榷的,他对于弗雷格的反驳也是值得怀疑的,并且陈波教授对弗雷格理论的修正无法令人满意。其次,王路教授对于陈波教授的观点做出了反驳,很多地方是一针见血的,但王路教授认为“弗雷格确实想说明思想是客观的”是值得商榷的。从《思想》一文得不出王路教授所认为的这一观点。最后,笔者认为,弗雷格所认为的“思想”实质上是具有约定性的地位。Professors Chen Bo and Wang Lu conducted discussions on Frege’s thought theory,focusing on whether“thought”belongs to the third field as well as Professor Chen Bo’s revisions of Frege’s thought theory.First,Prof.Chen Bo’s interpretations of Frege’s thoughts are worth further discussing,his refutation of Frege is questionable,and his revisions of Frege’s theory is far from satisfying.Second,Prof.Wang Lu makes a refutation of Prof.Chen Bo’s idea,somehow quite straightforward,but Prof.Wang Lu’s assumption that Frege indeed wanted to illustrate that thought is objective should be further discussed.Prof.Wang Lu’s idea is clear in his essay“Thoughts”.Finally,this paper holds that Frege’s through has a conventional status in nature.

关 键 词：弗雷格 思想 第三域 约定性 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]