民事诉讼律师强制代理:当事人主义诉讼模式的一种修正机制  

Compulsory Representation by Lawyers in the Civil Litigation: As a Mechanism of Modifying Litigation Mode of Adversarial System

作　　者：苏志强 Su Zhiqiang

机构地区：[1]山西大学法学院

出　　处：《政治与法律》2019年第12期14-24,共11页Political Science and Law

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金项目“回族聚居区宗教权威人士参与行政诉讼调解制度研究”(项目编号:16CFX019)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：当事人主导型诉讼模式是我国民事诉讼模式转型的目标。当事人主导型诉讼模式存在缺乏对当事人实质性平等保护以及容易被当事人滥用的缺陷,通过法官作用的强化来修正当事人主导型诉讼模式的缺陷时,法官阐明双重属性带来的操作性问题以及法官调查取证权所体现的职权主义因素容易导致职权主义模式的回潮。律师参与作为一种外部机制,能够平衡当事人诉讼能力、促进诉讼程序,并且不会破坏诉讼结构的平衡,应当成为修正当事人主义诉讼模式的一种可供选择的机制。结合律师强制代理制度的特点、我国民事诉讼制度和民事司法运行环境,分阶段、分程序、分案件,渐进地采行律师强制代理制度,应当成为我国民事诉讼中程序完善的重要策略之一。The litigants-dominated litigation model is the goal of transformation of China’s civil litigation model. There are some defects in the litigants-dominated litigation mode such as a lack of substantively equal protection for litigants and the likeliness to be abused by litigants, and when such defects are rectified through enhancing judges’ roles, it is likely to result the resurgence of inquisitional system due to the operability issues caused by the dual nature of the clarification of judges and the inquisitional elements reflected in judges’ power to investigate and collect evidences. Lawyers ’ participation, as an external mechanism,could balance litigants’ litigation ability, promote proceedings, and do not impair the balance of litigation structure., so it should become an available mechanism of modifying the litigation mode of adversarial system. Considering the characteristics of the compulsory representation by lawyers, China’s civil litigation system and civil justice environment, it should be an important strategy for improving procedures in China ’s civil litigation to gradually adopt the system of compulsory representation by lawyers in certain phases, for certain procedures and certain types of cases.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 当事人主义诉讼模式 职权主义诉讼模式 协同主义诉讼模式 律师强制代理 

分 类 号：DF728[政治法律—诉讼法学]