防卫过当的认定模式选择——兼及刑法第20条第三款的理解  

Mode Selection in Determining Excessive Defence——A Concurrent Discussion on the Interpretation of Criminal Law Article 20 Paragraph 3

作　　者：林仲尧 LIN Zhongyao(Law School of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610203,Sichuan)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《攀枝花学院学报》2019年第6期34-39,63,共7页Journal of Panzhihua University

摘　　要：防卫过当的认定一直是我司法实践与刑法理论的讨论焦点。目前争议集中在防卫结果与防卫行为何者为防卫过当的重心。在认定防卫过当的过程中,究竟以哪些要素为判断基底,需要从立法精神与法理逻辑两个角度出发。如何合理地区分理解行为和结果,已经是关系到正当防卫制度能否发挥作用的关键前提。The determination of excessive defense has long been the focus of judicial practice and criminal law theory.At present,the controversy focuses on whether the result of defense or the defence behavior is the center of determining excessive defence.Therefore,in the process of determining excessive defence,it is a necessity to examine from the perspective of legislation and logic of jurisprudence in order to find out the fundamental elements.Rational interpretation and differentiation between results and behaviors has become a key prerequisite for the functioning of justifiable defense system.

关 键 词：防卫过当 防卫行为 行为无价值 无限防卫 刑法 行为重心论 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学]