检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安超杰 An Chaojie
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学法律学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2019年第4期80-86,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:移动终端刑法评析可以类比传统PC终端,只需要对计算机信息系统做一个恰当地扩张解释即可。在定性外挂软件时,因破坏性外挂的法益侵害性很高,故而是刑法需要规制的对象。对外挂软件的刑法定性,理论及司法实践中认定不一,主要存在着非法经营罪、侵犯著作权罪、销售侵权复制品罪、破坏计算机信息系统罪、提供侵入、非法控制计算机信息系统程序、工具罪等几大罪名之争。从正本清源的角度来看,应当先明晰外挂软件自身的刑法评价,而后才可以进一步对相关行为做刑法上的定性,而在现有的刑法框架内,外挂软件的刑法规制应当是计算机类犯罪。Criminal regulation on the mobile terminal is analogous to the traditional PC terminal,by making a proper expanding interpretation to the computer information system.In qualitative research on plugin software,the destructive plugin software is the object to be regulate by the criminal law because of its high infringement of legal interests.In theory and judicial practice,the criminal regulations on the plugin software are inconsistent,including crime of illegal business operations,crime of copyright infringement,crime of selling infringing copies,crime of damaging computer information system,crime of providing intrusion,crime of providing program tools to illegally control computer information systems and so on.From the perspective of the original source,we should clarify the criminal evaluation on the plugin software first,then can we define the relevant behavior in criminal law.And within the existing criminal law framework,the criminal regulation on the plugin software should be computer crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7