检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘长江 苏振民[1] 林文雄[1] 汪城河[1] 吴雅莹 林东福 蔡加滨 LIU Changjiang;SU Zhenmin;LIN Wenxiong;WANG Chenghe;WU Yaying;LIN Dongfu;CAI Jiabin(Quanzhou Children’s Hospital,Quanzhou 362000,China)
机构地区:[1]泉州市儿童医院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2019年第32期131-132,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:比较注射曲安奈德和染料激光治疗婴幼儿浅表型血管瘤的效果。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月-2018年1月在笔者所在医院就诊的159例浅表血管瘤患儿,根据治疗方法分为注射组(n=70)和激光组(n=89)。对比两种治疗方法的效果及有效治疗时间。结果:激光组治疗的总有效率92.13%,显著高于注射组的78.57%,激光组有效治疗时间(2.12±0.33)个月,显著短于注射组患者的(3.48±0.45)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:染料激光治疗婴幼儿浅表型血管瘤的效果比注射曲安奈德治疗的效果要好,且激光治疗时间较短,对于浅表型血管瘤患儿,建议首先采用染料激光治疗。Objective:To compare the efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection and dye laser in the treatment of superficial hemangioma in infants.Method:A total of 159 children with superficial hemangioma treated in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into the injection group(n=70)and the laser group(n=89).The curative effect and effective treatment time of the two methods were compared.Result:The total effective rate of the laser group was 92.13%,which was higher than that of the injection group(78.57%).The effective treatment time of the laser group(2.12±0.33)months,which was significantly shorter than that of the injection group(3.48±0.45)months.And the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of dye laser in the treatment of superficial hemangioma in infants is better than that of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection,and the time of laser treatment is shorter.For children with superficial hemangioma,it is recommended to first use dye laser treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68