合理性维度:新宏观社会变迁理论刍议  

Rational Dimension: On the theory of New Macro Social Change

作　　者：李乔杨[1] 任红伟 周承鑫 LI Qiao-yang;REN Hong-wei;ZHOU Cheng-xin(College of Ethnology and Sociology,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang,Gguizhou,550025;CPC Suiyang Organization Department of Suiyang Party Committee,Suiyang,Guizhou,563300,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学民族学与社会学学院,贵州贵阳550025 [2]中共贵州绥阳县委组织部,贵州绥阳563300

出　　处：《凯里学院学报》2019年第5期17-20,共4页Journal of Kaili University

基　　金：贵州民族大学科研引进人才项目“西北边疆安全对策研究”(编号:15XRY019);国家社科基金“民族国家与国家民族建构研究”(14XMZ001);教育部重大招标课题“世界主要多民族国家的民族政策实践及对我启示研究”(15JZD034)子课题阶段性成果

摘　　要：华裔社会学家赵鼎新对中国历史社会有深入的研究。他在接受迈克尔·曼社会变迁理论的合理要素的基础上,于其《儒法国家:中国历史的新理论》著作中提出了关于宏观社会变迁之理论,以之系统分析中国古代历史发展规律。由于学界同仁对《儒法国家:中国历史的新理论》尚存不同理解,赵由此写下《哲学、历史和方法——我的回应》一文作为回应。《回应》清晰地诠释了其理论与迈克尔·曼之理论的不同之处。本文比较、分析了迈克尔·曼与赵鼎新各自理论的特点,认为理论的合理性宜取决于它能诠释社会现象的维度。这一判断对于社会理论的构建可资一鉴。Zhao Dingxin,a Chinese-American sociologist,has deeply studied Chinese history and society.On the basis of accepting the reasonable elements of Michael Mann's theory of social change,he puts forward the theory of new macro-social change in his book The Confucian-Legalist State:A New Theory of Chinese History,systematically analyzing the development law of ancient Chinese history.Zhao’s article:Philosophy,History and Method:My Response is his reply to his colleagues.“The response”makes clear the differences between his theory and that of Michael Mann's.The paper compares and analyzes the characteristics of Michael Mann's theory and Zhao Dingxin’s theory,as might serve as a model for the construction of social theory.

关 键 词：赵鼎新 迈克尔·曼 社会变迁 理论构建 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]