儒家“孝”之伦理困境及其解决方式——基于道德哲学的深层追问  

Ethical Dilemmas of Confucian Filial Piety and Corresponding Solutions ——In-depth Exploration Based on Moral Philosophy

作　　者：王健崭[1] 杨明 WANG Jian-zhan;YANG Ming(College of Marxism,China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 210009,China)

机构地区：[1]中国药科大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《江苏行政学院学报》2019年第6期5-11,共7页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute

基　　金：2014年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“儒家‘孝’伦理的精神哲学研究”(14YJC720027);2015年度中央高校基本科研业务费纵向配套项目“儒家‘孝’伦理的辩证运动研究”(2015PT066)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：中国传统文化中,儒家的"孝"有两个对应的概念:一个是"慈",一个是"忠"。按照儒家的理想:家庭里,父慈子孝是美满的;国家中,求忠臣必出于孝子之门是应当的。"孝"与"慈","孝"与"忠"在社会生活中应该是和谐相处、并行不悖的。但是,历史的现实却是父未必慈、子未必孝,而孝忠兼顾也往往处于两难境地。面对这些伦理困境,儒家采取了父权专制和君权至上的方式来加以解决,而这些解决方式的道德哲学根源则是儒家一以贯之的整体至上与个体至善的价值理念,对这一价值理念应辩证分析、审慎对待。In Chinese traditional culture, theConfucian "filial piety" has two corresponding concepts: one is "affection", and the other is "loyalty". In accordance with the Confucian ideal, happiness means that the father has love and son is faithful in the family;it is a norm that loyal officials be selected from filial sons in the country. In the social life, filial piety and affection, filial piety and loyalty should be in harmony and operatein parallel. However, historical reality is that fathers are not always kind, sons are not always obedient, and it is often in a dilemma that filial piety and loyalty both are taken into account. Faced with these ethical dilemmas, Confucianism had adopted a way of patriarchy and monarchical supremacy to solve the problem. Its root of moral philosophy is the unified Confucian values of that the whole is supreme, and the individual is of the highest good. This concept of value should be dialectically analyzed and treated with caution.

关 键 词：儒家 孝 慈 忠 伦理困境 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]