债权行使与财产犯罪的刑法疆界——建构合理的出罪路径与判断基准  

Frontier between Creditor’s Right Exercise and Property-related Crimes in the Criminal Law——To Construct a Reasonable Guilty Path and Judgment Benchmark

作　　者：张雪樱 ZHANG Xue-ying(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2019年第5期110-114,共5页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：不当行使债权行为在实践中多以无非法占有目的或缺乏财产损害为由否定成立相关财产犯罪。然而,结合非法占有目的的理论内涵和实践操作中存在的问题可以肯定其具有非法占有目的。且债权人具有债权与债务人的财产法益受侵害之间并不矛盾,债权人的行为侵犯了财产犯罪的保护法益。不当行使债权本身符合"不法-有责"的行为定型,只是对行为是否事出有因、手段的必要性和社会相当性角度予以违法性的实质审查后,存在部分因不具有实质违法性而阻却违法,因而不构成犯罪的情形。In the improper exercise of creditor’s rights, in practice, the establishment of related property crimes is denied on the grounds of no illegal possession or lack of property damage. However, the theoretical connotation combined with the purpose of illegal possession and the problems existing in the practice can be affirmed that it has the purpose of illegal possession. Moreover, there is no contradiction between the creditor’s creditor’s right and the debtor’s property law and interests, and the creditor’s behavior violates the protection of the property crime. Improper exercise of creditor itself in line-after "criminal responsibility" stereotypes of behavior, but behavior is by no means accidental, to be illegal nature of the substantive examination of the necessity and social correspondence angle means, there is some because they do not have the substance of illegality and negates illegal And thus does not constitute a crime.

关 键 词：债权行使 违法性 社会相当性 有因性 

分 类 号：DF522[政治法律—民商法学] DF6[政治法律—法学]