法定证据制度的“例外状态”——以诉讼历史的反思为视角  

The “Exceptional State” of the Legal Proof System:From the perspective of the reflection of litigation history

作　　者：郝晓宇 Hao Xiao-yu

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2019年第4期94-104,共11页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

摘　　要：当我们带着证据法学的理性主义传统来回溯历史时,法定证据制度往往带有落后、野蛮、残忍的否定色彩,而以贝卡利亚式的仁慈、合理、有效来批判诸如司法刑讯的顽疾,实际上是对法定证据、司法刑讯、坦承供认在诉讼制度历史中所扮演角色的"误解"。只有把法定证据制度放置在刑罚实践和刑罚认知的整体转变之中,先予理解公共诉讼在欧洲大陆最先开启法律秩序的"例外状态",才能真正还原并反思法定证据制度的历史意义和法律意义。When we look back upon the history of evidence law with the tradition of rationalization,the legal proof system always act as the role of the negative aspects with the uncivilized,barbaric and brutal relic.Therefore,the criticizing on judicial torture in the way of kindness,rationality and effectiveness from Beccaria,could be seen as the"misunderstanding"of the role of legal proof,judicial torture and confession in the history of litigation.With the overall transformation of penalty practices and penalty cognitions,it might help us to understand the historical and legal significance of the statutory evidence system in the way of"exceptional state",in which public litigation establishes the legal order in the earliest of continental Europe.

关 键 词：法定证据 司法刑讯 刑罚 公共诉讼 例外状态 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]