二程洛学的传承、分化与走向  

The Inheritance, Differentiation and Trend of Cheng Brothers′ School

作　　者：李敬峰[1,2] Li Jingfeng

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学系 [2]陕西师范大学哲学博士后流动站

出　　处：《中州学刊》2019年第11期108-112,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“关学《四书》学研究”(18CZX025)

摘　　要：以往学术史对二程洛学传承与衍化的研究多是粗线条或概论式的,这就无法系统而全面地展现洛学的流变史。洛学在二程之后,其衍化首先是二程弟子对洛学的传承与发展,以程门“四大弟子”为代表的门人,他们思想旨趣接近程颢,分化并不明显,但却接续洛学话语和延续学脉,使洛学在两宋之际得以薪火相传;其次是洛学的内部分化与学派分立,程门弟子四方传道,开宗立派,形成道南、湖湘、永嘉、兼山、涪陵以及金代郝氏等六大学派,旨趣不一,将洛学思想在尽可能的方向上推阐出来;最后是洛学的历史走向和影响,洛学后学虽然建构众多学派,但最终朝着闽学、心学和事功三个方向转化和定型,它们同源异流,尤其是所开出的理学与心学主导着两宋以来近千年的学术格局。The studies on Cheng brothers′School was contour and rough in the academic history in the past,and cannot show the history of Luo Studies systematically and comprehensively.The change of Luo Studies after Cheng brothers was due to their disciples′inheritance and development.The main four disciples of Cheng were close to Cheng Hao in ideological interest,so the differentiation was not obvious,and actually they made Luo Studies pass down on between the Northern and Southern Song Dynasties;Secondly,the Internal differentiation and school separation of Luo Studies emerged,with disciples preaching and establishing schools,forming the six great schools of Daonan,Huxiang,Jianshan,Fuling,Yongjia and Haoshi,their interest being different,and explaining Luo Studies in different direction as mush as possible;Finally,Luo Studies′trend and influence were divergent,Luo Studies were transformed in the three directions of Min study,Mind study and Shi Gong,which were homologous in origin but took different development routes.Especially Li School and Xin School had dominated the academic pattern for nearly 1000 years since the Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：二程洛学 弟子 学派 分化 走向 

分 类 号：B244.6[哲学宗教—中国哲学]