基于ESI的一流大学学科建设绩效评价及发展策略  

Performance Evaluation and Development Strategies of the Discipline Construction in First-Class Universities Based on ESI

作　　者：王伟伟[1] WANG Wei-wei(Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)

机构地区：[1]燕山大学

出　　处：《黑龙江高教研究》2019年第11期35-38,共4页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education

基　　金：2018年河北省社会科学发展研究课题“基于聚类分析法的一流学科绩效评价的实证研究”(编号:201804040122)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：基于ESI数据库,应用因子分析法对我国41所世界一流大学建设高校的学科建设绩效进行评价。得出以下结论:一是一流大学学科建设绩效差异显著;二是一流大学学科建设绩效与学科规模强正相关,且在0.01水平上显著;三是多数一流大学在学科建设中存在"重规模、轻质量"问题;四是评价结果客观验证了国家首轮"双一流"遴选标准的科学性。参考评价结果,将41所世界一流大学建设高校分为五个层次,并分类提出发展策略。Based on ESI database and factor analysis,this paper evaluates the discipline construction performance of the 41 first-class universities in China.The findings are as follows:Firstly,the difference of the discipline construction performance in the first-class universities is obvious.Secondly,there is a strong positive correlation between the discipline construction performance and the discipline scale in the first-class universities,and it is significant at the level of 0.01.Thirdly,the discipline construction of most first-class universities have the problem of emphasizing on scale but ignoring of quality.Fourthly,the evaluation results objectively validate the scientificity of the first round"double first-class"selection criteria.Finally,according to the evaluation results,the 41 first-class universities are divided into five levels,and development strategies are put forward according to the classification.

关 键 词：大学学科建设 双一流 世界一流大学建设 一流大学 遴选标准 绩效评价 因子分析法 绩效差异 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]