检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王怀斌 赵建强[2] WANG Huai-bin;ZHAO Jian-qiang(Thoracic Surgery Department,Shuyang Renci Hospital,Shuyang,Jiangsu Province,223600 China;Cardiothoracic Surgery Department,Huai'an First People's Hospital,Huai'an,Jiangsu Province,223001 China)
机构地区:[1]沭阳仁慈医院胸外科,江苏沭阳223600 [2]淮安市第一人民医院心胸外科,江苏淮安223001
出 处:《中外医疗》2019年第33期76-78,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探析食道癌患者采取不同手术治疗效果。方法该次研究74例食管癌患者均为方便选取该院及淮安市第一人民医院2015年2月—2018年11月接收的食管癌患者,根据入院单号、双号及患者意愿分为两组,每组37例,对照组开展传统手术治疗,研究组则接受管状胃根治术治疗,统计各组并发症发生率、住院时间、出血量及手术时间。结果两组患者研究组手术时间(85.63±12.34)min较对照组(127.54±16.85)min短,差异有统计学意义(t=12.206,P=0.000<0.05);研究组出血量(223.74±32.54)mL较对照组(425.17±46.87)mL少,差异有统计学意义(t=21.474,P=0.000<0.05),研究组住院时间(7.64±0.53)d较对照组(10.65±0.48)d少,,差异有统计学意义(t=25.605,P=0.000<0.05);在并发症发生率方面,研究组是5.41%,对照组是24.32%,研究组明显低于对照组并发症,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.232,P=0.022<0.05)。结论食道癌疾病治疗过程中,管状胃根治手术治疗效果显著优于传统手术治疗方案,不仅可以减轻患者临床病症,缩短治疗及住院时间,同时有助于增强患者肺功能,避免其他疾病的发生,值得推广并采纳。Objective To investigate the effects of different surgical treatments for patients with esophageal cancer.Methods 74 patients with esophageal cancer were convenienty selected in this hospital and Huai'an First People's Hospital from February 2015 to November 2018.Patients with esophageal cancer were divided into two groups according to the admission number,double number and patient's wishes.In each group of 37 patients,the control group underwent conventional surgical treatment,and the study group received tubular gastrectomy.The complication rate,hospitalization time,bleeding volume and operation time were counted.Results The operation time of the study group(85.63±12.34)min was shorter than that of the control group(127.54±16.85)min,the difference was statistically significant(t=12.206,P=0.000<0.05).The amount of bleeding(223.74±32.54)mL in the study group was less than that of the control group(425.17±46.87)mL,the difference was statistically significant(t=21.474,P=0.000<0.05),and the length of hospital stay in the study group(7.64±0.53)d was lower than that of the control group(10.65±0.48)d.the difference was statistically significant(t=25.605,P=0.000<0.05);in the incidence of complications,the study group was 5.41%,the control group was 24.32%,the study group was significantly lower than the control group the difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.232,P=0.022<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of esophageal cancer diseases,the effect of tubular gastric radical surgery is significantly better than traditional surgical treatment,which can not only reduce the clinical symptoms of patients,shorten the treatment and hospitalization time,but also help to enhance the lung function of patients and avoid other diseases.It is worth promoting and adopting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249