西方发展经济学的三大范式比较(下)  

Comparison of Three Paradigms of Western Development Economics(The Last Part)

作　　者：王今朝[1] 萨米 Wang Jinchao;Sa Mi

机构地区：[1]武汉大学经济发展研究中心

出　　处：《当代经济研究》2019年第12期52-59,F0003,共9页Contemporary Economic Research

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD790024);武汉大学马克思主义团队建设项目

摘　　要：从科学哲学的角度看,经济发展理论不只是发展的思路,而主要是发展的范式。西方发展经济学存在结构主义、新古典主义、马克思主义三大范式。这三大范式在概念、假设、方法论、解释、制度和政策建议、预测上存在着根本的差别,从而具有科学性上的根本差异。西方马克思主义发展经济学范式的科学性是最高的,这意味着无论是西方的结构主义和新古典主义,都不足以成为中国的经济发展指导理论。From the perspective of philosophy of science, the theory of economic development is not just about ideas of development, but mainly development paradigms. There are three paradigms of Western development economics, including the structuralism, neoclassicism, and Marxism. These three paradigms have fundamental differences in concepts, assumptions, methodologies, interpretations, institutional and policy recommendations,and predictions, and thus have fundamental differences in the nature of being scientific. The paradigm of Western Marxist development economics is most scientific, indicating that neither Western structuralism nor neoclassicism is enough to be a guiding theory for China’s economic development.

关 键 词：经济发展 范式 结构主义 新古典主义 西方马克思主义 

分 类 号：F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学] F093