检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史健达 卢宇婷 Shi Jianda;Lu Yuting(Graduate College,Heilongjiang University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150000,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学研究生学院
出 处:《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》2019年第12期119-122,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
摘 要:再审程序其本身作为两审终审制度的例外,就应当天然的具有谦抑性,其证明标准的设立便兼具维护生效裁判既判力和保障人权双重使命,比一般的刑事诉讼证明标准——“排除合理怀疑”多一层属性,也便更难以把握,因此对刑事再审程序中的证明标准问题的研究,对我国法学理论和实务领域具有重要意义。The retrial procedure itself,as an exception of the system of the court of second instance being the court of last instance,should be naturally modest.The establishment of its standard of proof has the dual mission of maintaining the effective judgment and protecting human rights.It has more attributes than the general standard of proof in criminal procedure-"beyond reasonable doubt",and it is also difficult to grasp.Therefore,the research on the standard of proof in the criminal retrial procedure is of great significance to the theory and practice of law in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38