黄道周论朱王异同——以《王文成公碑》等三文为中心  

Huang Daozhou’s Discussion on the Similarities and Differences between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming——Taking “Wang Wencheng Inscription” and Other Three as the Center

作　　者：郑晨寅[1] ZHENG Chen-yin(Minxue and Minnan Cultural Research Institute,Zhangzhou City Vocational Colleae,Zhangzhou 363000,Fujian,China)

机构地区：[1]漳州城市职业学院闽学与闽南文化研究中心

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第6期24-29,共6页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：黄道周生于朱子施政讲学之邦,又与平和、阳明颇有渊源。其《王文成公碑》认为朱王一脉相承:《书王文成公碑后》揭示阳明之学源自于践履;《〈王文成公集〉序》则盛赞阳明事功,寄托士人理想。黄道周身处明清易代之大变局与理学、心学交汇碰撞之际,他引"致知"释"良知",强调践履,主张经世致用。其论"朱王异同"既具有学术思想史的意义,也颇具时代与地域特色,可视为明末"会通朱王"的一个典型。Huang Daozhou was born in the place where Zhu Xi lectured,and he had a lot of origins with Pinghe and Wang Yangming.According to his"Wang Wencheng Inscription",Zhu and Wang is in the same line.Another later article revealed Yangming’s thought originates from practice.In the"Preface to the Collection of Wang Wencheng",he praised Yangming’s achievements and placeed his ideals on scholars.At the moment of the great changes in the Ming and Qing Dynasties and the confluence of Neo Confucianism and psychology,he introduced"Zhizhi"to explain"conscience",emphasized practice and advocated practical use.His discussion on the similarities and differences between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming not only has the significance of the history of academic thought,but also has the characteristics of the times and region,which can be regarded as a typical example of"connect Zhu and Wang"at the end of the Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：朱熹 王阳明 黄道周 会通 

分 类 号：B248[哲学宗教—中国哲学]